Some seriously good news yesterday from the front line battles for some sanity in the education conversation.
First, how nice is it to see the Governor who oversees 1/8 of all school children in the US come out and say “Enough!” when it comes to standardized tests? In his veto of California state bill SB547 which called for even more testing data to be used to evaluate school, teachers and kids, Jerry Brown wrote the following:
“The current fashion is to collect endless quantitative data to populate ever-changing indicators of performance to distinguish the educational ‘good’ from the educational ‘bad.’ Instead of recognizing that perhaps we have reached testing nirvana, editorialists and academics alike call for ever more measurement ‘visions and revisions.’
A sign hung in Albert Einstein’s office read ‘Not everything that counts can be counted, and not everything that can be counted counts.
SB547 nowhere mentions good character or love of learning. It does allude to student excitement and creativity, but does not take these qualities seriously because they can’t be placed in the data stream. Lost in the bill’s turgid mandates is any recognition that quality is fundamentally different from quantity.”
And how about the National Council Teachers of English, my favorite professional organization, who yesterday released a draft resolution opposing the Common Core Standards and national tests. The resolution still needs to be approved by the NCTE membership, but it’s an important statement nonetheless, A section of it reads:
No educator is opposed to assessments that help students to improve their learning. We are, however, opposed to excessive and inappropriate assessments. The amount of testing proposed by the US Department of Education in connection to national standards is excessive, inappropriate and fruitless.
The standards that have been proposed and the kinds of testing they entail rob students of appropriate teaching, a broad-based education, and the time to learn well. Moreover, the cost of implementing standards and electronically delivered national tests will be enormous, bleeding money from legitimate and valuable school activities. Even if the standards and tests were of high quality, they would not serve educational excellence or the American economy.
Resolved that the National Council of Teachers of English
* oppose the adoption of national standards as a concept and specifically the standards written by the National Governors Association and Council of Chief State School Officers
* alert its members to the counter-productiveness of devoting time, energy and funds to implementing student standards and the intensive testing that would be required.
Can I get an “Amen!”?
Could that actually be a light way down there at the end of the testing tunnel?