Will Richardson

Speaker, consultant, writer, learner, parent

  • About
    • About Will
    • Testimonials
    • Contact Will
  • Blog
  • Speaking
  • Coaching
  • Books
  • BQI

Why Do We Need to Teach Kids “Self-Motivation”?

July 21, 2016 By Will Richardson 2 Comments

From the “Ways of Thinking About Learning That Drive Me Crazy Dept.” comes this article in the Miami Herald titled “Ways We Can Make Students Interested in School.”

Now, anyone who reads this space regularly knows that I don’t think this is a very difficult question. We can start by looking at schools where kids actually enjoy the learning environment and process and try to discern what makes it so. We can ask ourselves what would make us interested in school if we were students. Heck, we could even ask the kids.

Those don’t seem to be in the mix for the author of this article, however. No, instead, this author seeks to “fix” apathetic kids. We have to teach kids, wait for it, to be “self-motivated”. That needs to become “the new educational buzzword” that should shape our work.

guitar deleteWhat this means, of course, is that kids should be trained to be self-motivated to achieve “habits and discipline that will lead to academic success,” two things that “have all but gone by the wayside” in our consumer driven society (of which kids are a part.) We do this by getting kids to “sit in the front, take notes, ask questions, be organized, do all the work, and find a study partner.”

And, as I’m sure you know, this is important because “because at some point in every person’s life, either at school or in a job or in a marriage, he or she will have to buck up and say, ‘This is hard. This is boring. I don’t want to do this. But I’m doing it anyway. And I’ll do my best.”

I love that last part, because it absolves anyone in schools from doing anything to make schools less boring. In fact, we actually should make school boring so kids can deal with boring jobs and boring marriages and boring whatever else when they become boring grown ups. So, if you actually enjoy school, you miss this important life lesson.

But here’s the thing: kids are self-motivated to learn out of the womb. They are constantly learning without being taught. They are constantly asking questions and figuring out their worlds, creating their own lesson plans on the fly, learning tacitly with and from other kids. Most kids are learning sponges, with technology or not.

And then they come to school and over a few years we drive it out of them.

The irony of the argument in this article is obvious: we’re supposed to be putting back in what we took away in the first place.

There are millions of kids in this world who love to come to school because school is a place that allows them to maintain their self-motivation to learn and finds ways to make sure the school stuff they need happens in contextually meaningful and relevant ways. Those schools start their work with where the kids are, put an emphasis on maintaining and nurturing that learning disposition they already have, and create cultures where boredom is rare or at least creatively useful.

Unfortunately, there are many millions more kids who are stuck in cultures where the those conditions are replaced with the “buck up” mentality that says “School and learning sucks sometimes. You need to learn our stuff whether you want to or not. So, get over it.”

No school, no culture, no environment is perfect. But there are models. And it’s not rocket science. Just depends on what extent we truly value kids as learners and not the objects of teaching.

(Image source: Kychan)

Filed Under: Classroom, learning

Embracing “Rapidly Changing Times”

July 7, 2016 By Will Richardson 1 Comment

If you follow me on Twitter, you know that I Tweet a fair amount about climate change, and how it’s something that we’re going to need to help our kids cope with on all sorts of different levels. From where I sit, this is now the work of schools, engaging students in the important questions we face and helping them develop the skills and dispositions to answer them and problem solve their way through it. I think of my own kids in this regard all the time. Are they ready? Will they flourish? Will the enjoy their lives?

Through our new Changeleader Facebook group, I found Superflux:

We work closely with clients and collaborators on projects that acknowledge the reality of our rapidly changing times, designing with and for uncertainty, instead of resisting it.

“A world in flux” feels totally right. Cultures around the globe are colliding with “historically unprecedented force.” We now have “local and global crises arising daily from our collective inability to deal with ever-faster change.” Political upheaval, racial tensions, economic uncertainty…I can’t think about it too long before I start feeling queasy.

179299295_1024a70998_bBut I do think about it. And we need to think about it with kids in our schools as well. We need to “acknowledge the reality of our rapidly changing times…instead of resisting it” in our classrooms, for the sake of our kids.

For instance, Superflux is thinking about “mitigation of shock” that will no doubt occur as the globe heats up.

The disconnect between scientific, data driven predictions of global warming, and the lack of immediately visible signs contributes to a space of cognitive dissonance, its implications unsettling and ominous. But it is also a space which offers the opportunity to confront our fears, to experiment with ways in which the shocks of the impact of climate change can be mitigated. It is in this space that we at Superflux have situated our research and design project: Mitigation of Shock.   We want to conduct experimental design responses to first world disasters that are likely to happen in the near future, by prototyping alternatives today. Tools, methods, materials and commons that individuals can learn, use and share in order to gain agency and capacity to mitigate the shock of climate change.

Tell me, why wouldn’t that be a worthwhile goal and challenge for our students? To “gain agency and capacity to mitigate the shock” of what is almost undeniably coming their way?

I know that these are difficult subjects to discuss with kids. But we resist at their and our peril. And we’ll all be better served if  the next generation is comfortable (as it can be), engaged, and capable with embracing uncertainty head on.

Asking questions that we don’t know the answers to would seem a logical place to start.

(Image credit)

Filed Under: Classroom, General, learning

Required: Rethinking Curriculum

June 13, 2016 By Will Richardson 1 Comment

What percent of what we learn in our adult lives is learned via a curriculum that someone else explicitly put together for us vs. a path of content and people and whatever else that we create on demand for ourselves in the moment? Especially now with the Internet?

In my life right now, I’d say it’s 90%-10% in favor of the self-created path. I’m guessing most people reading this are nodding their heads.

Now ask that same question of kids in school. In my own kid’s case, he says it’s almost the exact opposite.

6626010553_548212cb1b_b

It’s not hard to see that our focus in schools isn’t on learning as much as it’s on making sure kids become learned about the “best-guess” curriculum we put in front of them. Similarly, it’s hard to argue that that approach is getting them ready for the 90%-10% world of self-determined learning that we all know they’re going to live in.

Here’s truth: We now have access to more uniquely relevant and interesting resources for any given child to learn from and with than any organizationally selected curriculum could possibly offer.

Which is why the school curriculum should now be an act of creation instead of a highly scripted package of content for completion.

To quote Dave Cormier:

I’m starting to believe, more and more, that given THE INTERNETS, content should be something that gets created BY a course not BEFORE it. Our current connectivity allows us to actually engage in discussions at scale… can that replace content?

Interesting question…

(Image credit: Evelyn Giggles)

Filed Under: Classroom, On My Mind, schools

If Engagement is the Problem, Technology is Not the Answer

April 13, 2016 By Will Richardson 7 Comments

I have a standing search in Google News that lets me know when there are ever any new stories in the world that contain the following three words: school, technology, and learning. It’s not that I don’t have enough to do already without scanning the usual 15 or 20 articles that crop up on a daily basis from all over the place. And mind you, I don’t check the feed every day. (I’d probably be in therapy by now if I did.) But every now and then I drop in to see what people are doing that’s worthy of a write up in the local (or sometimes national) press.

That’s how I found this story from the ABC News affiliate in Fort Wayne, Indiana titled “E-Learning: Technology changing the culture of the classroom.” I’m always drawn to headlines like those because most often, the story doesn’t quite live up to the hypeline, if you will. And this one is no exception. [Read more…]

Filed Under: Classroom, Classroom Practice, learning, On My Mind, The Shifts

Transformative Technology? Really?

February 8, 2010 By Will Richardson

So I ran across this Smart Ease of Use video in the course of one of our threads in a PLP cohort and I have to say, I can’t seem to shake it. I mean, maybe I’m missing something here, but if this is a vision of “transformative” technology, we’re in some serious trouble. Worse, if this marketing piece actually does the job and creates sales of Smart boards, we’re in even bigger trouble.

Is this really a vision of classrooms and learning that we aspire to? Is it all about being “easy”? And what does it say when the manufacturer of one of the most popular pieces of technologies in schools presents this picture for what teachers and students should be doing in schools?

Help me…what am I missing?

Filed Under: Classroom Tagged With: smartboard shifts

Kids Owning the Learning

March 26, 2009 By Will Richardson

It’s been a great 10 days in Australia, one that’s been too packed for much blogging, obviously, and one that was highlighted yesterday by a visit to one of those “I really wish my kids went to school there” type of schools in a Melbourne suburb. It’s hard to capture everything that’s cool about the Wooranna Park Primary School in a blog post, but let me boil it down to this: the kids are driving the learning, from the design of the school and the curriculum to the decision making around school policy and more. It’s one of those inquiry-based learning environments where the moment you step into it you just feel something different. Different spaces. Different colors. Different conversations. Different stuff up on the walls.

I’m hoping to write more about what the principal Ray Trotter is trying to do at Wooranna, but for now, here are some of the highlights:

  • When the school got funding to renovate the year 5/6 part of the school, the teachers and students got together and decided that the theme for their studies that year would be “design”. So the students set out to create the timeline, select the furniture, create the space plans, and manage the budgets. It was an involved process, driven by important questions and fueled by the students’ desire (and passion) for creating a learning space they could flourish in. In the process, they interviewed architects, over-ruled the principal in the choice of classroom furniture (after doing detailed research on neck injuries caused by having to sit at round tables,) designed work stations (using Google Sketch-up), and oversaw the entire process. The result? A really stunning mixed open-space, flexible, comfortable learning environment that the students take pride in.
  • Everywhere you look in the hallways of Wooranna you see questions. One poster asks “How can we invent colors?” Another says “How have our tomatoes been coping with the 40+ (C) temperatures?” And my favorite, “What is learning?” The walls aren’t filled with products; they are filled with process. And the teachers and leaders model it. Hung prominently on the wall and often discussed with the students is the school’s “Raison D’Etre”. It quotes Plutarch, Vygotsky, Betts and others, and it’s based on questions; “What are the key principles for transformative learning?” “What do I want to change?”
  • School government takes the form of the fifth and sixth grade students meeting each Friday in a discussion session that replicates the Australian Parliament. For the first half of the year, half of the kids run the government, and the other half takes over at the midway point. The leaders are elected by the student body, and they go about making real decisions about real projects and policies.
  • When they graduate from Wooranna, students perform original music and dance that they have written and choreographed. In fact, they compose a lot of their own music throughout the year. And art. And media.
  • Ray Trotter, the principal, talks easily about social constructivism, connectivism, George Seimens, Stephen Heppel and many of the other ideas and people in this space. But at present, due to some restraints with the technology, there is not a great deal of connecting out to the world, though his is looking for schools to video conference with and is beginning to move down that road.

There’s more, as usual. But I’ll leave it with this one thought from Ray, one of many, that jumped out at me during our conversations: learning is not a linear exercise, it’s random, it’s self-directed, it looks like spaghetti. And at Wooranna, it’s very, very obvious.

Filed Under: Classroom, On My Mind Tagged With: classrooms, wooranna

Series on Rethinking Assessments at Edutopia

April 3, 2008 By Will Richardson

This month’s Edutopia magazine has a pretty comprehensive series on rethinking assessment written by Grace Rubenstein that picks up on my question here yesterday in some provocative ways. (Full disclosure: I sit on the national advisory board for Edutopia’s parent organization, the George Lucas Education Foundation.) It’s heartening to read passages like this:

“What we want to assess is how well prepared people are to learn new things in a nonsequestered environment where they have access to technology tools and social networks,” says Bransford. Compared to typical standardized tests, for which seeking new information would be considered cheating, he says this model is “way more motivating, much more interesting for students, and much more valid in terms of what people really need to do when they get out of school.”

That phrase “nonsequestered environment” really catches me. We don’t stay in classrooms all of our lives, do we? How do kids do when the curriculum isn’t delivered, the homework isn’t assigned, and the work is for real purposes? What will they do when they are faced with a question they don’t know the answer to? How will they work it? How will they tap into their networks, if they have them? How will they assess the information they get back and assess their own process?

That would be some amazingly important work to watch and evaluate, wouldn’t it?

Filed Under: Classroom Tagged With: assessment, edutopia

Dispatches From the Front Lines #324

March 19, 2008 By Will Richardson

“So, are you the principal here?”

“Yep.”

“How many kids?”

“About 1,300 K-12.”

“Wow. That’s a mix.”

She smiles.

“So how much technology do you have?”

“Quite a bit actually, but it’s been difficult of late.”

“Oh? How’s that?”

“Well, we’ve been a 1-1 school for seven years, but we haven’t been able to buy any laptops for the last three.”

“Wow. That must be a pretty major issue, huh?”

“Well, our budgets have been cut, and the support has been difficult.”

“Anything bright on the horizon?”

“Well, we did just get a $100,000 from our local council for technology.”

“Well, that’s great. That ought to get you a couple of hundred laptops.”

“Not exactly.”

“What do you mean?”

“It’ll buy us about 50.”

“Fifty! Why only 50?”

“The specs.”

“What specs?

“The bidding specs for the city.”

“Bidding specs?”

“The cheapest laptop we can buy is around $2,000.”

“How much?”

“Two-thousand.”

“Two- thousand? Wow.”

Awkward silence.

“You know you can get a laptop for like, $300-$400 these days, right.”

“I know.” She sighs.

“Two-thousand. Wow.”

“Yep.”

Awkward silence. Bell rings.

“Well, good luck with that.”

“Thanks.”

She walks down the hall trailing a group of kids.

Oy.

Technorati Tags: schools, technology, education

Filed Under: Classroom, On My Mind

Many Voices for Darfur Project

March 4, 2008 By Will Richardson

From our good friend Mr. Mayo, who with Wendy Drexler has come up with another great project to participate in:

For 48 hours, starting at midnight Eastern standard time on March 6, 2008, many student voices will be collected in the name of those suffering in Darfur. Be sure that your voice is among them.

Men, women, and children in the Darfur region of Sudan are dying. The Sudan militia and Janjaweed are responsible for as many as 500,000 deaths and 2,500,000 displaced refugees. You can learn more about the genocide taking place in Darfur by visiting the Many Voices for Darfur Wiki. Once you have had a chance to learn more about Darfur, please post your comment to one or more of the following prompts below:

  1. If you could visit the camps in Chad and sit down one-on-one with a refugee who is your age, how would you explain what you or others are doing in your country to spread awareness and make a difference?
  2. Write an open letter to Omar al-Bashir pleading your case for the Darfur region of Sudan.
  3. Write an open letter to leaders in your country to make a case for government support of international efforts in Darfur.

Tell your friends!

Filed Under: Classroom Tagged With: collaboration, darfur, education

"Clearning the Tabs" Episode #473

September 26, 2007 By Will Richardson

Only 29 tabs open today. Here’s a few of the things I’m hanging on to:

Twitter Tales: This might be old news since I’m having trouble even finding my aggregator these days much less read anything in it, but somehow I stumbled across Nancy White’s “Twitter Collaboration Stories” Wiki. Really cool. Twitter as “Virtual Water Cooler”. Twitter for “Serendipitous Improvement”. And, my favorite, Twitter for “Global Presence and Participation in Professional Development.” Who woulda thunk just a few short months ago that this kinda whacky, 140-character, micro-bloggy, not-sure-why-the-heck-I-like-it-but-I-do tool could have so many good uses? And, of course, the even warmer fuzzy is that you can add your own story to Nancy’s wiki. Life is good (as long as the Cubs win, of course.)

Electoral Education: So I’m not a Hillary Clinton supporter at the moment, though she’s still in my mix. And I have to say that after listening to her responses to the education question at the Yahoo Democratic Debate Mashup, I’m a little more impressed. She actually says things like “Is education working in the 21st Century?” and “We have to ask ourselves some tough questions about how we better prepare our children who live in a very media rich environment and who are much more tuned into the world than I ever was at their age” and “just because I went to school and folded my hands on my desk with the teacher at the front of the room does that mean we need to keep on doing that year after year after year?” (or something close to that.) And in response to a Jonathan Kozol question, she says “we should not look at our children as if they are walking tests…we’ve gone way overboard…” On balance, considering it’s politics, I was surprised. (Now if only she didn’t laugh at the Bill Maher question the way she did.)

Sage Students: Darren coined the term “scribe” to describe the student whose responsibility it was to summarize and extend the days events from class on the blog. But now KB Foglia has come up with a different, and I think even more interesting moniker for students working her AP Bio blog: “sherpa.” “Each day a student in class will be assigned to be the class sherpa — our guide who will show us the clear path up the mountain of knowledge.” Nice.

Quote O’ the Day: “They expect to be part of the discussion, part of the living thing that text itself is becoming.  This is how we get kids excited about language, about writing, about thinking: by giving them the power to be part of the conversation. When we lock our machines down, filter their internet service and not allow them to be contributors we take away the involvement, the intensity, the power. Remember doing grammar worksheets in school? I don’t. But I do remember art class, the time I got to take part in making a radio play and another teacher that let us act in class. They involved me, they challenged me, they forced me to think, to play with language, to defend my opinions. Language fairly pulses and thrives across cyberspace. Let kids in to the conversation.” Clarence Fisher

25 to go…

Technorati Tags: learning, education, technology

Filed Under: Classroom, On My Mind

Dispatches From the Front Lines (Con't)

December 18, 2006 By Will Richardson

I came across this post from Pat Aroune in Western NY who has been diving head first into Read/Write Web tools with his students:

About one month ago, I asked five students to participate in an online experiment utilizing Skype and an online interactive whiteboard called Vyew. Vyew is a free, always on collaboration and web conferencing site that allows individuals real-time desktop sharing and capturing. I met with this small group of students, and we began what was essentially on online tutoring session for an upcoming essay. We did nothing that had not been done during the course of a classroom session, except we were all in our individual homes, and it was 8:30 p.m.. I began to sense, over the course of that hour long session, a wave of energy and enthusiasm from the participants. One month later, this concept of online collaboration has taken on a life of is own. Just last night,twenty sophomores from my A.P. European History classes, met online and did a Skype – Vyew session in preparation for an essay exam today. The remarkable thing is, I was not even a part of it. Individual initiative got last night’s conference off the ground. More power to the students!

You might want to check out the reflections of some of his students on another post as well.

Almost as cool is that Pat’s superintendent Neil Rochelle is blogging about his efforts to bring the tools into the school as well. And this post reflects the type of approach that I’ve been thinking and writing about more and more lately. It’s his recap of a monthly Parent and Student Cabinet meeting where they are talking about the Read/Write Web and it’s use in his school. The result:

Students that have been involved in blogging and social bookmarking love the use of these tools that are being made available and integrated into their instruction. Their chief “complaint”….they are overwhelmed! Because we have attracted teachers to the use of these tools in “pockets” across the district, the same teachers are teaching the content as well as the “how tos” for using the technology. Students feel that they need to learn the newest technology in another class BEFORE using it in these selected classes. A point well taken and one that I will be giving much thought to. Consensus however is they love the approach. They are motivated by on-line collaboration such as internet conferencing such as Skype and video conferencing. Before this year, MySpace was a close as they came to social networking. Now they see an educational value.

It reminds me that kids are overwhelmed too, that they don’t know all of this, that we still have a great opportunity to lead and model appropriate and effective uses, and to learn from each other and our students. Pat and Neil are taking their school in a much different direction, and it’s pretty exciting to watch.

Just some feel good for the holiday…any other stories to share?

Technorati Tags: learning, education, School20

Filed Under: Classroom, Read/Write Web

The Guerilla Season Book Blog–Eric Langhorst

October 25, 2006 By Will Richardson

Just a quick link to another example of how teachers can use blogs to enhance the reading of a book in class by extending conversations past the school day, linking to resources and relevant materials, inviting parents to read and study with their children, inviting students from other parts of the country to collaborate and have students learn directly from interacting with the author of the book. What a concept!
Guerrilla Season is the book, Eric Langhorst of the Speaking of History podcast is the teacher, and it appears he’s looking for more participants.

Check it out and join us if you like. In addition to the students here in Liberty, Missouri we have students in California and a teacher in Louisiana taking part right now. It just started so there is plenty of time to join. I want to thank Pat Hughes for taking such an interest in our project. She is commenting directly to reader questions and spending a great deal of with this project. How incredible it is for an author to be communicating with her readers while they read the book!

Makes me nostalgic…

technorati tags:Eric_Langhorst, blogging, learning, education

Filed Under: Classroom, Weblog Links

SecondLife Law School

September 14, 2006 By Will Richardson

I haven’t been back to SecondLife in a while, but after seeing the news that Harvard Law is offering a course there this fall, I’m starting the download to my MAC as we, um, speak. Charlie Nesson and his daughter will be teaching CyberOne: Law in the Court of Public Opinion in meat space, but you can also take the course, watch video lectures, sign up for virtual office hours and participate in discussions and the like through your avatar. Watch the video to get the idea.

I’m going to see if I can check some of this out and report back, but if anyone else does, please let me know what the experience was like…

technorati tags:secondlife, HarvardLaw, weblogg-ed, education, learning

Filed Under: Classroom, The Shifts

Experts vs. Collective Intelligence

August 31, 2006 By Will Richardson

First let me say that the comments on the previous post have been pretty amazing and thought provoking. I want to comment on the comments at some point, but first I just wanted to throw out this excerpt from Convergence Culture by Henry Jenkins. This is, like, Part 3 in my blog book report.

There is a chapter where he talks about the efforts of some Survivor (the TV show) fans to “spoil” the season’s outcome by collectively gathering intelligence and comparing notes on the evidence all in an attempt to determine the winner well before the season finale. It’s a pretty interesting description of a long, complex process that relies of the work of the group but still bumps up against the “who can you trust” issues that we all face these days.

To give context to the discussion about how trust and authority are changing these days, Jenkins cites Pierre Levy’s notion of collective intelligence as compared to Peter Walsh’s “expert paradigm.” My point here is to talk about how this relates to the whole teacher as learner discussion in that we are now living in a world where collective intelligence is becoming more powerful and relevant to being a learner, but we’re educating our kids in classrooms still under this idea of experts at the front of the room. Here goes.

Walsh argues that our traditional assumptions about expertise are breaking down or at least being transformed by the more open-ended processes of communication in cyberspace. The expert paradigm requires a bounded body of knowledge, which an individual can master. The types of questions that thrive in a collective intelligence, however, are open ended and profoundly interdisciplinary; they slip and slide across borders and draw of the combined knowledge of more diverse community.

This is why tests are becoming less relevant, no question. Read the article in the Times today about schools who no longer require the SAT. They save the best quote for last:

“Human intelligence and ambition is more complex, more multifaceted, than any standardized testing system can capture,” Mr. Hiss said.

We cannot know everything. Today, knowledge has no bounds. Truth is in flux, and this requires a network, a community to make sense of it.

Second, Walsh argues that the expert paradigm creates an “exterior” and “interior”; there are some people who know things and others who don’t. A collective intelligence, on the other hand, assumes that each person has something to contribute, even if they will only be called upon on an ad hoc basis.

Why shouldn’t we contribute what we know to others? Why is “knowing” set up to be a competition? When we can connect around ideas that are in flux, everyone can contribute. It’s a much more democratic way of thinking about things.

Third, the expert paradigm, Walsh argues, uses rules about how you access and process information, rules that are established through traditional disciplines. By contrast, the strength and weakness of a collective intelligence is that it is disorderly, undisciplined, and unruly. Just as knowledge gets called upon on an ad hoc basis, there are no fixed procedures for what you do with knowledge. Each participant applies their [sic] own rules, works the data through their [sic] own processes, some of which will be more convincing than others, but none of which are wrong at face value. Debates about rules are a part of the process.

We really struggle with this as educators, don’t we, this giving up of the rules about knowledge? This is where the whole idea of Wikipedia just breaks down for a lot of us. Along these lines, I’m finding that the most powerful part of Wikipedia for educators to see is not the history of changes, though that can be pretty powerful, but instead the discussions, the negotiations that occur by the writers in the back channel. The example of the Delta Connections flight that crashed this week is a great example. It’s the messiness of the process made transparent. They, and we, make up the rules, make the decisions as part of the process.

Fourth, Walsh’s experts are credentialized; they have gone through some kind of ritual that designates them as having mastered a particular domain, often having to do with formal education. While participants in collective intelligence often feel the need to demonstrate or document how they know what they know, this is not based on a hierarchical system and knowledge that comes from real-life experience rather than formal education may be, if anything, more highly valued.

I don’t need a degree to be valued for my ideas in an environment where I can share freely and where people can engage with my ideas. Doesn’t our work become more important than what we “know?” And I know that degrees measure work as well as a knowledge, but still. This is what I know. You can believe me or not…your choice. But you can believe me based on my track record and my participation as a learner in the community, not simply based on the letters after my name or the diplomas on my wall.

Much, much more to think about, as usual…

technorati tags:education, learning, Henry_Jenkins, Pierre_Levy, classroom, teaching

Filed Under: Classroom, Connective Reading, The Shifts

Technology in Meet Space

August 28, 2006 By Will Richardson

There have been a spate of posts of late that talk about the role of technology in general and Web 2.0 technologies specifically in the classroom and also about the larger question of the acceptance of technology in general as a teaching and learning tool. Not surprising, is it, that these threads would pop up as school begins, at least here in the Western World.

Jeff Utecht started by writing about “Transition Techies” and lamenting the fact that technology is still seen as an option to most educators, not a requirement.

For most schools technology integration is optional. So I am supporting an optional program. I know it’s been said before but: As long as teachers have the option to integrate technology, some will opt not to. Since computers first started showing up in schools it was optional. Some teachers used the computer labs others didn’t.

I find myself wondering if these are, indeed, transition technologies in the sense that at the end of the day, blogs and wikis and the like come closer to pen and paper technologies than most of what has come before and that because of that, they may finally be the tools that bring us to the point where we stop talking about technology and start talking about practice. Obviously, it will take ubiquitous access for that to truly occur. But in my own case, this is not something that I can separate from the way I live and work. And I think that’s what we have to see happening in schools. The list of reasons why it hasn’t already is long and well documented, and Jeff’s post offers much to think about.
Later, Miguel Ghulin takes it a step further by writing that technology in schools isn’t just optional, it’s irrelevant.

Optional technology use? We are supporting a dream, a vision that was popularized by vendors, pundits, and high priced keynote speakers. We’re still in search of the high tech, high touch. The reality? The reality is that schools don’t see technology as optional. Rather, it is irrelevant…whether the laminating machine works is a more relevant concern. Maybe that’s splitting hairs, but I see irrelevant as much worse than optional. Optional implies that technology might be used if the teacher chooses, that it has some worth. Irrelevant says that there is no worth, whether you choose to use it or not.

I agree that there is a de facto irrelevance (whether we say we see the need for technology or not) if the people in leadership positions aren’t walking the walk and using technology as a part of their practice. I think of Tim Lauer and Tim Tyson who lead by example, and how rare that is when it comes to technology in schools. But is that only going to be solved when new, younger, technology facile leaders emerge?

Finally, Chris Sessums weighs in with some thoughts on the state of Read/Write Web tools in our classrooms:

Integrating the Internet and social software into the classroom is a complex and multifaceted process. As we stand today, there is very little research regarding which technology is most appropriate and effective for particular tasks. In my mind, this is a good thing. This is where creativity steps in – and this is what education is all about (i.e., trying out ideas, experimenting with software, making mistakes, reinventing, etc.). More importantly, effective and appropriate use involves the competent and committed involvement of people. To this end, Internet search engines and social software such as weblogs, wikis, and social bookmarking sites provide a rich and resourceful environment for educators and learners of all ages.

If, of course, they are willing to take the time to make them their own.

technorati tags:teaching, education, technology, classroom

Filed Under: Classroom, On My Mind

Setting Up a Blogging Classroom

August 23, 2006 By Will Richardson

So this looks pretty interesting…

Jenn has 60 students spread across 3 classes at Saint Rose college in Albany, New York. Jenn is going to have all of the students blog for class, it is a writing class, and I will leave the explanation at that. Jenn can say more about this and her goals for the class. What I am going to do is help Jen figure out how to get all the students set up, with minimal technical difficulties, and to help Jen figure out how to track all of the students postings.

There are a lot of details here which I will get into in future posts. But as an overview, I will be posting here on Academhack about the technical side. I am going to try outline step by step how this gets done. I will also hopefully create screencasts so that others can reproduce the efforts, borrow or change as they see fit. My goal is to create the tutorials on the level of web browser interface. This means if you are familiar with a web browser, can use Firefox, IE, Safari . . .than you should be able to follow the steps. Like I said, low entry barrier, open source.

The first post is already up.

Jenn’s class blog is called Expos-i-story, which I love, btw, and she’s already doing some interesting reflecting on her process and thinking. . It’s on a university level, but I can’t imagine it wouldn’t be instructive to K-12 teachers as well. Low entry and open source are filled with Web goodness…

technorati tags:education, blogging, college, expository_writing, teaching

Filed Under: Blogging, Classroom

So, This is a Good Way to Teach Kids

July 25, 2006 By Will Richardson

Here’s the lead from a New York Post article today titled MySpace Invaders for City Students:

City public-school students better beware what they blog when classes resume in September.

A revised draft version of the city Department of Education discipline code calls for harsh punishments – including expulsion – forstudents who post “libelous or defamatory material or literature” on the Internet.

Kindergartners to fifth-graders who disparage their teachers, principals or fellow students on the Web could face a finger-wagging parent conference or be suspended for up to 90 days, according to theproposed discipline code.

For students in sixth grade through high school, derogatory online postings would warrant an automatic suspension and could necessitate expulsion under the new rules.

Nowhere in the article does it mention anything about teaching kids appropriate and acceptable use, which doesn’t mean that they’re not doing that, but it makes you wonder. And this approach is just doomed to failure. It’s a “deal with it” moment where the city is choosing to do just the opposite.

Now I know I don’t have to say this, but I’m going to anyway. Welcome to the new world. Resistance is futile. Education is the only answer.

technorati tags:blogging, NYC, education, fear

Filed Under: Blogging, Classroom

The Blogging Exam

June 24, 2006 By Will Richardson

Clarence shares some answers to his Podcasting, Blogging Exam Question, and my favorite without question is

“…..now that we have podcasting and blogging anyone can do it. You don’t need to be some rich person in New York, you can produce from your own home. It has also changed how we can learn in today’s society.”

Amen. Amen.

technorati tags:blogging, education

Filed Under: Blogging, Classroom

Banning Laptops in College Classes

May 3, 2006 By Will Richardson

Just thought this post on Engadget was pretty interesting, especially the comments that follow. I know that this is a problem in just about any type of meeting situation where wifi and laptops are present. Which, of course, begs the same question that the podcasting of classes begs: If the content isn’t for the most part interactive and engaging (which, in theory at least, would preclude students from surfing the Web) why are we teaching it? I’m about ready to do an RSS workshop here at MICCA. Should I have them close their laptops when I’m talking???
Disruptive technologies indeed…

Filed Under: Classroom, On My Mind

Student Teachers

November 15, 2005 By Will Richardson

One of the ideas that I try to really drive home when I’m out blogvangelizing (Read/Write Webvangelizing?) is that a) since most of our kids are coming to these tools with arms open, and b) since the ability to produce content is getting easier and easier, and c) finally, since it’s so much easier to publish the content we create, unlimited opportunities now exist for our students to become teachers in a real way. Case in point, Clarence Fisher’s students who are making videos about math. I just love this idea, because the purposes of this exercise are self apparent. As compared to just a few years ago when the only reason you’d create a video about math is because your teacher told you to and you needed a good grade, now the reason you create videos about math is to, um, teach someone else about math. (Doh!) So, the idea of audience (not just the teacher) is built in. And since it is, it’s just another way of changing the equation (bad pun, I know) when it comes to what we do with student work.

I searched the web and all I could find were videos that were at least high school level and mainly college. Of course, I got an idea. Why don’t we make our own? Talking about this with my students, they agreed. They saw a gap we could fill in the knowledge that was posted online. They thought it would be helpful for themselves, and for others.

How cool is that? Helpful for others. Who exactly? Who knows! But that’s the point. It’s for a real audience who is going to do just what Clarence’s class initially did, search for videos that can help them understand math concepts. Only this time, there will be some there to tap into.

And you can see what’s coming, can’t you?

If these videos turn out to be useful for us and for others, I hope they will become the first in a library of these videos that we will be creating. Another set this year will give us 14 concepts, by the end of next school year, we could have 28 of these online. A worthwhile project.

This is the potential that we have to understand. This is what changes everything about our classrooms. It’s not rocket science, but it is a huge shift away from the way we’ve been doing things for 100 years.

I really, really love this stuff.
—–

Filed Under: Classroom, General

Blogging 101–Web logs go to school

October 17, 2005 By Will Richardson

C-Net gets on the blogs as learning tools bandwagon with a pretty good overview of the direction this is going (though we still can’t get past the “online journal” label…) They quote Clarence Fisher in the lead:

Like other teachers bringing blogging into the classroom, he thinks the online journals will spark students’ enthusiasm for computers, writing and opining.

“They’re learning the technical skills, but they’re also learning that they have a voice online,” he said. “They may be from a tiny town in the middle of nowhere, but they’re writing online, people are commenting on it, and they’re learning that they have a voice.”

A bit more mo’ for our cause. Go blogs! Go!
—–

Filed Under: Classroom, General

Five Years of Classroom Blogging

August 16, 2005 By Will Richardson

I know that I have said this before, but very few edubloggers out there have more practical experience than Barbara Ganley at Middlebury College. She’s back from an extended break with a post that talks about getting ready for her fifth year of using blogs in the classroom.

And so, here I am, back again, delighted to be a part of this evolution of blogs in our classrooms, convinced that we should take the time to help our students develop a grammar of and a practice of academic blogging, both individual and collaborative, then pretty much step out of the way except to ask questions and provide feedback (i.e. step out of the center of the blog and thus the classroom). Our students will surprise themselves by how much they accomplish even in a single course in a single semester. Imagine if all their courses, all their semesters, all their disciplines of study were connected via their blogging…

Barbara is definitely an inspiration, and she mentions a visit I made to Middlebury, must be three summers ago now to meet with her and Bryan Alexander, Sarah Lohnes, and Hector Vila. I think that was the first time that I had truly been in the company of bloggers, and the fact that it was at such a beautiful and well-respected educational setting just validated a lot of what I was feeling about blogs back then. If these guys were using them, there must be something to it.

And there definitely is. If you don’t believe me, believe Barbara, who is without question someone who has been a wonderful teacher of mine through her blog. If it’s not on your list of regular reads, it should be. I’m really looking forward to see what she has in store for her students this year.
—–

Filed Under: Classroom, General

NY Times on Blogs and Podcasts in Ed

August 3, 2005 By Will Richardson

So the Times highlights some of the pioneering work done by Bob Sprankle in podcasting at Pat Delaney in blogging. It’s really great to see Pat’s contributions highlighted as he was one of (if not the) original edublogger who has been off-blog for the past couple of years.

Mr. Sprankle’s experiment with podcasting in the classroom is just one of the interactive technologies some pioneering teachers are using in schools nationwide. Most work teachers have traditionally had students do online – searching Google instead of card catalogs, doing exercises online instead of in workbooks – has largely been in the mold of offline coursework.

These days, though, some teachers are building coursework around low-cost, software-based technologies. Some other programs include a blog shared among students in rural Maine and inner-city students in San Francisco to promote writing and cultural perspective; a voice over Internet protocol, or VoIP, exchange among schools worldwide to practice foreign language and debate skills; and an urban planning course that’s taught using a virtual world.

Even better, the article raises some of the tough questions that we’re all beginning to grapple with:

Still, some educators are not completely sold on the value of interactivity. “If interactivity becomes the fundamental basis of the educational process, how do we judge merit?” asked Robbie McClintock, a learning technologies expert at Teachers College of Columbia University.

The push by some teachers for greater interactivity in the classroom also goes against the current emphasis on testing. Testing requires a known body of material, but interactive learning often involves students’ seeking out topics on their own.

What a concept, huh? I LOVE IT! And, I love the Skype Foreign Language Lab in Del Valle, TX. Phone pals among 47 schools in seven countries!!! What an awesome idea.

Now you and I read this and go “this is the future!” But I wonder how someone with no real context for these technologies and these shifts feels. Wonderment? Fear?

Go blogs. Go!

Filed Under: Classroom, General

NYT: Students Say High Schools Let Them Down

July 17, 2005 By Will Richardson

Well, duh. Is it any surprise that a nationwide survey by the National Governors Association find dissatisfaction from students about their high school experience? Bored. Dumbed down. Not challenged.

We are becoming irrelevant because we continue to advocate a system that doesn’t allow our kids to pursue their individual interests and challenge themselves in meaningful ways.

How sad is it that “a large majority of high school students say their class work is not very difficult…” What does that say about what we’ve been doing for the last 100 years?

Filed Under: Classroom, General

Furlblogging

February 23, 2005 By Will Richardson

Ok, so this isn’t revolutionary, but it’s kind of a neat application of Furl that I really hadn’t thought of. (One of those “Doh!” moments.)

The journalism 2 kids here have their own blogs and Bloglines and Furl accounts. As they write their stories, they’re Furling all of the relevant pages they find. So, on each of their sites, we’re pulling the RSS feed from their Furl archive into the right hand column, so anytime someone Furls something, it automatically shows up on the page. No biggie, I know. But the cool part is that as the kid Furls the site, he blogs it, meaning he annotates it, writing about what the potential use and relevance the information there has to his story. So, he’s got a handy reference right in front of him as he plans the story.

Now, if we could just have them tag the pages in del.icio.us and then push those feeds to the left column while importing relevant feeds for photo tags from Flickr…

Filed Under: Classroom, General

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Next Page »

Recent Posts

  • “Never”
  • My 2023 “Tech Cleanse” Has Begun
  • Five Themes for Educators in 2023
  • Schools in a Time of Chaos
  • Has This Crisis Really Changed Schools?

Search My Blog

Archived Posts

Copyright © 2026 Will Richardson · All Rights Reserved

Follow me on Twitter @willrich45